It's/Its you're/your Turn!

I haven’t written in a while now, so Arashi has set me a very interesting edublogging challenge to prompt me to sharpen the virtual pen yet again and thus make up for lost time. It involves covering a 20 day journey through teaching and (why not?) learning experiences, regular as well as cross-curricular. Just to keep you on your toes, I won’t be disclosing all topics at once. Instead, I’ll dive directly into Day 1:

Tell about a favorite book to share or teach. Provide at least one example of an extension or cross-curricular lesson.

Upon reading this first challenge, I thought I wouldn’t be able to decide. However, Day 18 has provided me with a loophole (and that’s about the only spoiler I’m giving you). Suffice it to say that, for now, I’ve narrowed it down to Lynne Truss and her Eats, Shoots and Leaves (+ the workbook Can You Eat, Shoot and Leave?, designed by Clare Dignall). Not only because I am fond of unconventional approaches to (teaching) grammar, but also because a couple of weeks ago, I organized a workshop based on the book and I’d like to draw on that particular training session.

Once every two Business English classes, my students and I focus on General English, either in terms of grammar and vocabulary, or developing various sub-skills, such as improving our pronunciation and dealing with language varieties.

Since punctuation is, more often than not, a trigger of humor, puns and (intentional?) ambiguity (especially online!), I decided to broach the subject during class. Naturally, Lynne Truss and the “punctuation workout” she puts forward popped in my mind almost immediately. In an amusing, witty and learner-oriented manner, the author of Eats, Shoots and Leaves touches on a number of topics, ranging from commas, colons, hyphens, brackets and other “regular” punctuation marks, while also poring over the whims of emoticons and italic writing.

However, most non-native speakers of English tend to brood over the apparently elusive nature of the apostrophe. Hence the implacable wars, waged on 9gag or the like. All in the name of the infamous “your/you’re” duo, defended by voracious (and equally mutinous) readers. So, without further ado, I went for the Apostrophe.

Below, the main points we covered during our workshop:

Students' Examples

A Perfect Stranger

A PERFECT STRANGER - THE CHALLENGE: 

I was about to teach Present Perfect. I was actually quite excited about it, since I had come up with some interesting activities, meant to engage my group of adult learners in a meaningful learning experience. I was no stranger to the difficulties this tense usually poses to non-native speakers of English, so I had devised a series of “contraptions”. I had suggestive visuals, relevant examples, audio samples, interactive tasks, and all the IT-related analogies I could think of to make sure Present Perfect would no longer be “Undesirable No.1”. We went through most of what I had prepared. They seemed to comprehend. My trainees used Present Perfect almost flawlessly, they smiled and worked together. I was proud.

However, in the middle of our lesson, one of the trainees put up his hand and told me: “Yes, it’s all very well, teacher. But what IS the purpose of Mr. Perfect here? I mean, nobody speaks like that anymore.” Hardly had he uttered this comment when the rest of the group started expressing similar views. They chorused that their school years had been plagued by rules regarding the Present Perfect; they had been quizzed incessantly on this topic and had never seen its purpose. It might have been dubbed “Perfect”, yet it was nothing but “Strange”. They had, obviously, learned the rules to pass the tests (“You know the drill, teacher!”), but had failed to come to terms with them.

A PERFECT STRANGER -  CHALLENGE ACCEPTED: 

So, in spite of my efforts to get them acquainted, Present Perfect was still a… “Perfect Stranger” to them. I was rendered temporarily speechless. Of course these adult learners, who were doing overtime to improve their English (and mind you, they were all a fair B2!), were entitled to go beyond rules and understand why our colleagues from the US said “He just left” or “She already sent the mail” instead of “He has just left” or “She has already sent the mail”. Especially since we couldn’t actually relate to a similar tense in Romanian. As I was sharing this thought with them, I had an immediate brain wave and said: “It’s all about making an informed choice. It’s about conveying what you mean. Like writing code. You rely on certain syntax, communicate intention, define clear parameters, and use sensible indentation. Thus, you produce readable, clean code, which not only works, but can also be understood by the person at the other end.” The murmur ceased. “Think about it in code: If uncompleted action, then Present Perfect (He hasn’t sent the mail yet). Else Past Simple (He sent the mail yesterday). Where yet=uncompleted action, yesterday=finished action.” It dawned on them. The string already-just-yet-for-since-ever-never was merely another set of parameters, bringing them closer to producing readable, real-life “code”. We then talked about differences in written/spoken English, British/American English. 
The following week, I received versions of Present Perfect, encoded in C++, Python or Java. 
I was proud.